RESUMO
Radiotherapy uses high-energy X-rays or other particles to destroy cancer cells and medical practitioners have used this approach extensively for cancer treatment (Hachadorian et al., 2020). However, it is accompanied by risks because it seriously harms normal cells while killing cancer cells. The side effects can lower cancer patients' quality of life and are very unpredictable due to individual differences (Bentzen, 2006). Therefore, it is essential to assess a patient's body damage after radiotherapy to formulate an individualized recovery treatment plan. Exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can be changed by radiotherapy and thus used for medical diagnosis (Vaks et al., 2012). During treatment, high-energy X-rays can induce apoptosis; meanwhile, cell membranes are damaged due to lipid peroxidation, converting unsaturated fatty acids into volatile metabolites (Losada-Barreiro and Bravo-Díaz, 2017). At the same time, radiotherapy oxidizes water, resulting in reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can increase the epithelial permeability of pulmonary alveoli, enabling the respiratory system to exhale volatile metabolites (Davidovich et al., 2013; Popa et al., 2020). These exhaled VOCs can be used to monitor body damage caused by radiotherapy.
Assuntos
Humanos , Testes Respiratórios/métodos , Expiração , Qualidade de Vida , Sistema Respiratório/química , Compostos Orgânicos Voláteis/análiseRESUMO
Objective To explore the related risk factors of aortic esophageal fistula (AEF) after esophageal carcinoma operation.Methods According to the design of case-control study and matching proportion of 1:3,18 cases of AEF after esophageal carcinoma operation treated in the thoracic surgery department of Daping Hospital of Third Military Medical University from 2000 to 2015 served as the observation group,and contemporaneous 54 cases of esophageal carcinoma operation,who had approximate basic diseases or risk factors,were selected as the control group,18 pairs were formed.The risk factors possessed by the observation group before disease onset such as age,sex,tumor TNM stage and tumor location served as the matching variables.The non-matching variables including operation time,preoperative body mass index (BMI),amount of intraoperative hemorrhage,preoperative LDL level,anastomosis mode,postoperative pulmonary complications,postoperative arrhythmia,preoperative hypertension,preoperative diabetes and number of removed lymph nodes were performed the case-control study.Results The univariate Logistic analysis preliminarily screened out 5 risk factors,including preoperative obesity,preoperative LDL level,postoperative pulmonary complications,anstomosis mode and number of removed lymph nodes,the difference in other factors was not statistically significant (P＞ 0.05).The multivariate non-conditional Logistic stepwise regression analysis revealed that preoperative obesity (OR =8.63,95 ％ CI=1.35-17.60),preoperative LDL level (OR =0.81,95 ％ CI =0.23-0.98) and the number of intraoperatively removed lymph nodes (OR =0.32,95 ％ CI =0.14-0.59) had statistical differences between the observation group and control group,but the difference in other factors had no statistical significance.Conclusion Preoperative obesity,preoperative LDL level and number of removed lymph nodes might be the risk factors for AEF occurrence after esophageal carcinoma operation.
RESUMO
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in conjunction with hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treating patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods:A total of 62 CRC patients with complication of PC were divided into the CRS group, namely, Group One (n=29, CRS and systemic adju-vant chemotherapy) and the CRS+HIPEC group, namely, Group Two (n=33, CRS+HIPEC). The primary end point of the study was overall survival (OS) and the secondary end point was serious adverse events (SAE). Results:Patients' clinicopathologic characteris-tics, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, and completeness of cytoreduction therapy were well balanced and comparable between the two groups. The median follow-up was 41.9 mo (6.5 mo to 110.0 mo) in Group One and 32.0 mo (10.5 mo to 95.9 mo) in Group Two. The median OS was 8.5 mo (95%CI:4.9 mo to 12.1 mo) in Group One and 14.5 mo (95%CI:11.9 mo to 17.1 mo) in Group Two (P=0.007). Within 30 days after the surgery, SAE occurred in 3 of the 29 patients in Group One, and 9 of the 33 patients in Group Two (P=0.126). Multivariate analysis revealed that HIPEC, CC0-1 score, and chemotherapy over six cycles were the independent factors for OS improvement. Conclusion:The CRS+HIPEC method improves the OS of patients with PC from CRC, suggesting an acceptable safety.
RESUMO
Objective To discuss the value of combining the physiological and operative severity score for enumeration of mortality and morbidity(POSSUM)and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ)in severe acute pancreatitis(sAP).Methods 60 cases of SAP were divided into surgery group(n=15)and non-surgical group(n=45),Non-surgical group was vahde with APACHE Ⅱ score,the surgery group with POSSUM score,decided to continue conservative treatment or surgery treatment,Observation of two ways with the complications and death.Results The rates of compHcafions and death were(0.37±0.08)and(0.27±0.09)in Single-operation group(n=15)higher than(0.76±0.14)and(0.61±0.15)in surgical group(n=11)(t1=3.125,t2=3.211,P＜0.01);APACHEⅡ score of mortality in operation group and non-surgical group were no significant difference(x2=2.28,x2=1.98,P＞0.05);APACHE Ⅱ score were(10.12±6.27)in survival group(n=46)were lower than (25.75±7.90)in death group(n=14)(t=2.525,P＜0.05.Conclusion The score of dynamic APACHE Ⅱ has better effect to judge the timing of surgery,and the score of POSSUM has high value to predict post-operative complications and deaths occurred in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.